On May 16, 2015 there were many articles written on the last graduating class at Sweet Briar College. Basically there are two sides, the pros and cons of the closure. Most of those who opposed the closing based their reasoning on emotional factors, while the pros applied past institutional metrics to support such an unpopular decision. What the data show, is that given its present facts about enrollment and the availability of resources then the continuation of the college operation is impossible.

What one can learn from this case is that fundamental changes on the conditions and environments where a college operates need to be taken into account very seriously when managing a higher ed. However, making policy changes to adapt with the new conditions are not always easy, especially when the change will create personal conflicts of those who do not want to go beyond their comfort zone. Had the College made unconventional decision many years ago such as to merge with other peer colleges in the areas, the closure may not need to happen. What does it take to be able to take that route? Set aside the ego, pride, emotion, history and personal interests. Look at what is the best for the students, members of the society, institution and the country. In short, be realistic! Think about the emotional and financial impacts of such a closure to those who are affected. The closure of the College may not be the last that one will hear. Other colleges might be able to learn from such a case and reinvented ways to save their own institution.  The invention cannot be accomplished effectively through a BAU approach.  Rather, by unconventional ways.